Adem Somyurek has threatened to vote against the bill

Adem Somyurek, a former Labor MP who has been marginalized, has threatened to block a controversial debate in the Andrews government. pandemic, which could derail the passage of legislation in the upper house of Victoria.

Mr Somyurek has returned to the state parliament to sit as an independent judge after he was ousted from the Labor Party last year on charges of stacking branches.

In an opinion article in the publication Herald Sun.Somyurek said he believed the proposed pandemic law would give the government “too much power” and he would not support it.
Victorian MP Adem Somyurek
Former Labor MP Adem Somyurek said he would vote against the bill. (Jason South)

“If I had continued as a member of Andrews’ board, I would have argued that this bill is a bad idea because it gives too much power to the board, ”he said.

“I do not support this bill in its current form, and I encourage the government to return to the table and negotiate more broadly.”

Somyurek’s decision to vote against the bill has confused the government’s plan, as the law will not pass if eight other voters who oppose the law also vote against it.

If the bill does not pass through Parliament within the next two weeks before the emergency regulations expire, the Victorian government will not be able to implement the pandemic regulations.

Only three controversies have expressed support for the law, including Green MP Samantha Ratnam, Animal Justice Party Andy Meddick and Reason leader Fiona Patten.

“Because the Labor Party controls both houses and Parliament can no longer carry out its oversight functions, internal control and collective decision-making through the cabinet and the election assembly is even more critical,” somyurek said.

“But I’ve been on the three Labor government, and the party assembly and government have never been as sidelined as they have been during this term.

“The three crucifixes are likely to be heard before members of the party assembly and ministers.

“This leaves (Prime Minister Daniel) Andrews as the sole decision-maker, which is not acceptable in a complex modern government.”

Hundreds of protesters have camped on the steps of the parliament building this week. (Photo by Chris Hopkins)

The government announced seven key changes to the law on Monday after strong criticism from lawyers and human rights activists, but some critics said the changes did not go far enough.

The government is working to postpone the bill in order to get the support it needs to pass it.

Prime Minister Daniel Andrews said today that a pandemic law is necessary to ensure the rules can come into force after the emergency mandate expires on 15 December.

“We’ll make sure that by December 16, if someone comes here from another country and gets the virus, we’ll make sure they go into hotel quarantine,” he said.

“We need to make sure we can put in place rules to protect the private and public lives of older people.

“An irregular environment means all of these simple, practical things are just a fraction of what we had last year because we’re all vaccinated, but the rules still have to be there.

“We’re not locked up.”

Andrews told reporters he had no message for Mr Somyurek.

What happens if the bill goes through or doesn’t go through?

The Public Health and Welfare Change (Pandemic Management) 2021 would replace the power of the Victoria Emergency and authorize the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health of the Day to declare pandemics and oversee health guidelines in place of the Director of Health.

If the bill is not passed, the Victorian government will have no legal framework to implement COVID-19 after December 15 – when the state of emergency ends.

The state of emergency cannot be extended beyond this date due to its limitations, which means the government will compete against time to get through the bill.

However, Mr Somyurek’s plan to block the bill means the legislation is deadlocked, derailing the government’s plan to get pandemic laws to replace emergency powers next month.

Somyurek’s intervention has raised suggestions that the government could postpone the vote until the next parliamentary session in two weeks, instead of threatening a big defeat.

Leave a Comment